Dr. Craig S. Wright’s cousin Max Lynam, an IT expert, shared details about the early days of Bitcoin during the recent Hydronaut trial in Oslo, Norway. Lynam discussed how he and Wright shared a childhood interest in computers and coding that continued into adulthood as they both pursued careers in the technology industry. Lynam’s family has a long history in computing and electronics, dating back to his grandfather’s involvement in WWII codebreaking.
Dr. Wright had discussed the creation of online trading and tokenization networks, and in 2008, he requested permission from the Lynam family to test some software on their computers. The software was thought to be a transaction validation process for one of Dr. Wright’s digital tokenization systems, and it ran on the machines until 2011, when the family’s e-commerce business failed.
Wright later revealed that the software was Bitcoin-related and that the machines had mined 6,500 coins. Lynam had always suspected Wright was the creator of Bitcoin, but had paid little attention to it until Wright was publicly linked to the alias Satoshi Nakamoto in 2015.
Lynam’s testimony adds to the growing body of evidence pointing to Dr. Wright as the creator of Bitcoin, also known as Satoshi Nakamoto. His participation in the development of online trading and tokenization systems, as well as his early interest in computers and coding, correspond to the knowledge and skills required to create the digital currency.
Furthermore, his use of the Lynam family’s computers to test software in the years leading up to the public release of the Bitcoin protocol lends credence to his claim to be the currency’s inventor.
Dr. Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto
Dr. Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto has also been met with skepticism and controversy in the crypto community. Many have criticized his claim for inconsistencies and a lack of concrete evidence.
The fact that the trial in Norway is unrelated to Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity, and that some of the evidence presented has been disputed by experts in the field. Furthermore, the case in the United Kingdom is still ongoing, and the final verdict has not been announced.
In conclusion, while Max Lynam’s testimony adds to the growing body of evidence supporting Dr. Wright’s claim, it is not conclusive, and Satoshi Nakamoto’s true identity remains a topic of ongoing debate and discussion in the crypto community.
At Tokenhell, we help over 5,000 crypto companies amplify their content reach—and you can join them! For inquiries, reach out to us at info@tokenhell.com. Please remember, cryptocurrencies are highly volatile assets. Always conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Some content on this website, including posts under Crypto Cable, Sponsored Articles, and Press Releases, is provided by guest contributors or paid sponsors. The views expressed in these posts do not necessarily represent the opinions of Tokenhell. We are not responsible for the accuracy, quality, or reliability of any third-party content, advertisements, products, or banners featured on this site. For more details, please review our full terms and conditions / disclaimer.