David Schwartz, Ripple’s Chief Technical Officer (CTO), recently commented on an amicus brief submitted in support of Coinbase in the ongoing legal dispute between Coinbase and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The latest update says that the action adds a new level of intricacy to the case, which the banking and cryptocurrency industries have keenly followed.
The amicus filings were appreciated, according to Coinbase’s chief legal officer Paul Grewal, who also emphasized their ability to clarify the purported legal mistakes made by the SEC. These briefs were submitted by third parties not directly involved in the case and are meant to offer the court new information and viewpoints that may affect its decision.
It was said that one amicus brief has received a lot of attention and has been dubbed “devastating” by legal expert “MetaLawMan.” Six eminent securities law experts came together to create this brief, which thoroughly examines the case and its ramifications. It was revealed that law professors from universities like Yale, the University of Chicago, UCLA, Fordham, Boston University, and Widener University, and are also represented in the club.
The amicus brief deftly navigates through the development of the term “investment contract” throughout history, charting its progression before, during, and following the passage of the federal Securities Act in 1933. This historical viewpoint is said to give the court context as it considers whether securities laws apply in the developing fields of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
Amicus Brief Explained, Says Outcome May Redefine The Cryptocurrency Industry
The handling of the holding in Joiner by the amicus brief has drawn criticism from Ripple CTO David Schwartz. The classic case Joiner vs. Rivas has important ramifications for interpreting securities laws. Schwartz argued that the Joiner decision’s fundamental principles needed to be sufficiently addressed in the brief, implying that the scholars may have missed important details that could have impacted their conclusion.
David Barrera, a member of the social networking site Twitter, recounts Schwartz’s doubts by criticizing what he sees as the group of law experts’ “gross disregard” of the actual holding in Joiner. Discussions about the oversight’s potential effects on the legitimacy and force of the arguments in the amicus brief have been raised by this observation in the legal community.
Tomiwabold Olajide, while analyzing the situation on the U.Today platform, said that the engagement of other legal experts, like as law professors with extensive experience in securities law, adds a layer of complexity and insight to the Coinbase-SEC action as the judicial procedures progress.
Olajide added that the court’s view on the case might be influenced by the amicus filings, which may change how the court perceives Coinbase’s defenses and the SEC’s claims. The case has continued to grab the attention of the cryptocurrency community, financial institutions, and legal scholars alike. It has become more intriguing with the involvement of prominent figures like Ripple CTO David Schwartz and legal specialists.
Schwartz also commented through his Twitter handle that at the lowest point in the brief, the handlers didn’t do a good job resolving the holding in Joiner. However, the court’s final ruling will be extensively scrutinized as it takes these new viewpoints into account to ascertain how it might affect the constantly changing landscape of cryptocurrency rules.
Tokenhell produces content exposure for over 5,000 crypto companies and you can be one of them too! Contact at firstname.lastname@example.org if you have any questions. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Some of the posts on this website are guest posts or paid posts that are not written by Tokenhell authors (namely Crypto Cable , Sponsored Articles and Press Release content) and the views expressed in these types of posts do not reflect the views of this website. Tokenhell is not responsible for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or any other content or banners (ad space) posted on the site. Read full terms and conditions / disclaimer.